|
We examine the first
part of Réflexions sur la Puissance Motrice du Feu (Carnot S. 1978,
pp. 1-112); our purpose is to find out in the book all occurrences of double
negated sentences (DNSs), which we show to be typical of a theory based
on non-classical logic. We have collected 63 DNSs (see Appendix). This kind
of analysis highlights what author's presentation implicitly presupposes;
and therefore it reveals his fundamental hypotheses beyond his exposition.
This great number of DNSs is an extraordinary result, in comparison with previous
analyses performed on original books of different physical theories. They
are enough for representing the whole content of Sadi Carnot's theory (flow-chart
A). Moreover, we have obtained six basic steps in the development of Carnot's
theory as represented through an ordered groups of DNSs (flow-chart Bs).
The occurrences of DNSs since the beginning of the exposition, qualifies
the theory as being organized upon a basic problem. Since the beginnings
Sadi Carnot questions the existence or not of an upper bound for transforming
heat in work, and how to determine it. These problems are put through a
DNS. Then, some methodological principles are enunciated through DNSs belonging
to non-classical logic. In total, the analysis shows that Sadi Carnot consistently
follows his theoretical choice, that is to work within non-classical logic.
A relevant result of this investigation is the discovery of five methodological
principles instead of the commonly considered two principles. Two of them
(DNSs 9, 39) - ignored by previous historians - concern the relationship
physics-mathematics. Indeed, our study on theory through DNSs has shown
that the whole first part of Sadi's book is aimed to solve a fundamental
problem of mathematical physics: by relying upon empirical date, to study
whether the efficiency function
can be considered as a mathematical function representing the efficiency
of a heat machine that depends on few variables: Q, t, P, V (flow-chart
C). On the other hand, contrarily to our expectations, DNSs don't suggest
anything about the problem that impassioned many historians, from Ostwald
(Ostwald) onwards: why S. Carnot uses two words (calorique and chaleur)
when he referred to heat?
Drago A. e Pisano
R.: "Interpretation and reconstruction of Sadi Carnot's Réflexions
through original sentences belonging to Non-Classical Logic", 2004,
Ronchi Found. 615-644
Please,
don't esitate to contact us
for further information.
Non
esitate a contattarci per
ulteriori infomazioni.
|
|